After viewing Argo, I took my regular lap around the usual
film websites, seeing what critics and fans thought of the film to see
differing opinions and if I had missed anything. From rotten tomatoes and metacritic I saw
positive reviews, which I tended to agree with if, although as enthusiastically
as some critics. However, when I headed
to the message boards on IMDB I was pleasantly surprised to see plenty of hate.
Some of the hate came from the film’s recent best picture
win. I would agree with most of these
posters who were surprised at the win. I
enjoyed the film and thought it was very well done, but I didn’t see it as
anything groundbreaking or remarkable, which is what usually comes to mind when
I think Best Picture (although that is certainly not always the case). I didn’t share as much hate as many irate
posters, but I could understand the arguments of the more descriptive contributors
who managed to include more than one sentence filled with swears and poor
spelling.
The hate I could not understand, however, came from people
who claimed Argo was a piece of pure propaganda. Terms like “one-sided” and “conspiracy” were
being thrown about quite freely, with arguments ranging from fairly coherent to
paranoid. The User Review on the front
page was entitled “Vomit enducing propaganda”, and predictably did not come
with a very good rating but instead with some cleverly worded hatred and a
shallow review.