I remember when I was younger, and I loved any film I
saw. When I saw “Daredevil” in theaters,
I loved it. “The Nutty Professor 2”? Big fan.
“Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd”? Genius.
Sometime early in high school, I gained the ability to notice if a film
was complete shit. But that didn’t stop
me from still enjoying “Van Wilder”, even after I was busy telling my
classmates that their tastes in films were awful and that “Scary Movie 4” was
an abomination that they should be ashamed of enjoying.
But why did I enjoy “Van Wilder” so much? Until I previously rewatched it on tv, I
hadn’t seen the film for a few years, but still had fond memories of watching
it a few times in high school. But
why? I couldn’t understand how I could have
liked a film that was so awful.
Maybe it was because I had yet to grow a strong hatred of
Ryan Reynolds. This was fairly early on
in his film career, before he seemed to pop up in a new piece of shit film
every two months. He had yet to appear
in all those annoying trailers for “The Proposal”, where he is forced to marry
his Canadian boss played by Sandra Bullock (which is a creepy film plot for so
many reasons). He hadn’t yet helped ruin
the Blade franchise with his portrayal of a vampire hunter almost as douchy and
unlikeable as the vampires in the Twilight series. And he hadn’t been cast as Hal Jordan in “Green
Lantern”, which might go down as the second most forgettable comic book film
adaptation from recent years (#1 on that list goes to Jonah Hex, which would
never be remembered if not for Megan Fox).
It is impossible to tell if he would piss me off as much were I to see
the film for the first time, or if I’m clouded by how much of a Hollywood
douche he has become.
Maybe it was Tara Reid, who I thought was fairly attractive
at the time. I was a high school boy, so
maybe some decent sex appeal could cloud my judgment of a film. Plus, I hadn’t learned about her disturbing
plastic surgery exploits (something called a “doughnut mastopexy” is involved),
had not seen the horrifying pictures of her without makeup, and had not gained
a general disdain of her (kinda like with Ryan Reynolds). But honestly, there were plenty of films I
thought were horrible and yet had attractive actresses, so that couldn’t be it.
It could have been that I didn’t care how they named the
Indian character Taj Mahal Badalandabad (played by Kal Penn). Seriously, did I not care about how he was a
ridiculous Indian stereotype with an offensive name whose only goal was getting
laid, helping out his white friend (Van also had a black friend to help him
out, bit of racism?), and betraying his cultural values in order to assimilate
into American culture (because fuck other countries with their unique cultures)? This was, of course, before Kal Penn played Kumar in Harold in Kumar (which
appropriately dealt with the issues of preconceived notions based on things
such as being Indian), or before he worked for the White House Office of Public
Engagement. Seriously though, was I not
pissed about them naming an Indian character Taj Mahal?
Or maybe I was intrigued by the party life of college being
portrayed. As a less-than-super-popular
kid, I wasn’t invited to many cool kid parties, and did not spend much time
with girls who looked like Tara Reid or acted like Tara Reid. Van Wilder promised college would be full of
enormous fully furnished dorm rooms with hot tubs and pet dogs, beautiful sunny
campuses where I could drive to class in my pimped out golf cart and could just
park in the parking spot assigned for that teacher I had been feuding with
since I messed around with his daughter freshman year, and parties where every
single person was super attractive and wearing an expensive costume to go along
with the theme. Watching the film now, I
can call bullshit on their depiction of college. I had a great time in college, my frat house
did get a pet dog, and after enough alcohol everyone at the parties looked good
enough even if they didn’t dress up for our dinosaurs and sluts themed party. But it isn’t anything like Hollywood depicts,
unless you are filthy rich and incredibly attractive in which case go fuck
yourself.
Very likely it was the character of Van Wilder that made me
like the film. Yes, partly it was
because I liked Ryan Reynolds, but I also wanted to be the super-cool guy who
solved all the problems and who everyone got excited to see at parties. I wanted to host naked runs, and throw roller
disco parties. I wanted to win the girl
away from the douche guy, and make him eat pastries with dog semen (seriously,
was I that immature in high school?).
But looking now, Van just seems like a huge jerk. Part of that is definitely due to my newfound
hatred of Ryan Reynolds, no question.
But let’s examine the character, and see if he is a decent human
being. First, he comes from an insanely
rich family and can afford things such as a hot tub and golf cart in
college. Then, while at his seventh year
of college, all of which had been paid for by his father, he is forced to pay
for one semester at college. Oh my god,
what a tragedy, how could his father do such an awful thing like that? Seriously, anyone who has their parents pay
for their education is incredibly blessed, and even spoiled a bit. Poor Van, he has to pay for ONE SEMESTER OF
COLLEGE. He has to suffer hardships such
as not being able to pay his assistant Taj (by the way, shouldn’t it just be
called slavery since he isn’t being paid?), and has to get a job (which is just
him throwing parties for other rich people, and at these parties he has to talk
to all the hot college girls who think he is dreamy). But it’s ok, because even though he suffers
all those hardships, he ends up getting the girl of his dreams.
By the way, did we mention that the girl of his dreams that
he won over was already in a relationship, and this relationship was so serious
that the boyfriend even proposed to her?
Douchebag Van chose a girl with a boyfriend over the seemingly endless
wave of single girls who were all over him.
Yes, the girl’s boyfriend was a jerk, but it’s still a dick move to go
after a girl with a serious boyfriend.
And besides, the boyfriend was mostly just a jerk to Van, and only
because Van was trying to steal his girlfriend.
What else makes him a bad guy?
The fact that he is in a fraternity and gets upset when his girlfriend
interrupts pledging (which she totally did, and was very rude of her)? The fact that he is rich and dresses nice
(the exact opposite of Van, of course)?
Or is it the fact that he cheats on his girlfriend after she already is
ignoring him and basically throwing herself at Van? Honestly, are we supposed to hate the guy who
loses his girlfriend and then has that girlfriend sabotage his chance to get
into medical school where he can become a doctor and help sick people not die?
So getting back to my main question, why did I like this
movie? Maybe it’s because I didn’t
overanalyze the character of Van Wilder.
Maybe I was less mature and a film with a farting stripper didn’t
disgust me as much. Maybe the soundtrack
had just enough sounds I liked to put me in a good mood (Jimmy Eat World, oh
nostalgia). But let’s be honest, it was
because I wanted to be cool like Van, there was attractive women, and I didn’t
notice Ryan Reynolds is one of those people you just want to punch in the face. Whatever, I’ve wasted enough time wondering
this stupid question.
No comments:
Post a Comment